Single-case synthesis tools II : Comparing quantitative outcome measures
By: Zimmerman, Kathleen N.
Contributor(s): Pustejovsky, James E | Ledford, Jennifer R | Barton, Erin E | Severini, Katherine E | Lloyd, Blair P.
Series: Research in Developmental Disabilities : Special Issue on Quality of Single-Case Experimental Research in Developmental Disabilities 79 August 2018: 65-76. 2018Subject(s): INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
| RESEARCH | METHODOLOGY | QUALITY ASSURANCE | STANDARDS | SINGLE-CASE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS (SCED) | SENSORY BASED INTERVENTIONSOnline resources: Click to read article online IHC Library Members Summary: Conclusions from this review suggest evaluations of the effectiveness of interventions examined in the context of SCD can be influenced by the synthesis method selected. Recommendations for methods to evaluate design quality (Synthesis Tools Part I) and outcomes (Synthesis Tools Part II), in relation to the methods evaluated in this review, may also assist researchers in selecting an appropriate method to synthesize SCD when evaluating interventions to identify evidence-based practices.
No physical items for this record
Conclusions from this review suggest evaluations of the effectiveness of interventions examined in the context of SCD can be influenced by the synthesis method selected. Recommendations for methods to evaluate design quality (Synthesis Tools Part I) and outcomes (Synthesis Tools Part II), in relation to the methods evaluated in this review, may also assist researchers in selecting an appropriate method to synthesize SCD when evaluating interventions to identify evidence-based practices.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.
