Comparison of two strategies for teaching reading comprehension skills

By: Ezell, Helen K.
Contributor(s): Hunsicker, Stacie A. (et al).
Series: Education and Treatment of Children 20 (4) 1997: 365-382.Publisher: 1997Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volume Subject(s): TEACHING STRATEGIES | EDUCATION | EDUCATIONAL DELIVERY | EDUCATIONAL STRATEGIES | READING | LITERACY SKILLS | LITERACY | COMPARATIVE STUDIESSummary: This study compared two instructional strategies for teaching reading comprehension to fourth grade students. A peer-assisted procedure involved 25 students working in dyads to ask and to answer comprehension questions regarding a reading passage. A teacher-assisted procedure involved 23 students working alone to develop questions followed by a class discussion that focused on asking, critiquing and answering students. Both interventions taught students Question Answer Relationship (QAR) strategies. Although all students increased their reading comprehension skills, results showed no significant difference between the two groups on standardised reading assesments or performance on intervention probes. [AJ].
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Article Research IHC Library Article (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available (Article available on request) 13826
Total holds: 0

This study compared two instructional strategies for teaching reading comprehension to fourth grade students. A peer-assisted procedure involved 25 students working in dyads to ask and to answer comprehension questions regarding a reading passage. A teacher-assisted procedure involved 23 students working alone to develop questions followed by a class discussion that focused on asking, critiquing and answering students. Both interventions taught students Question Answer Relationship (QAR) strategies. Although all students increased their reading comprehension skills, results showed no significant difference between the two groups on standardised reading assesments or performance on intervention probes. [AJ].

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha