Reporting of use of coercive measures from a Dutch perspective
By: Frederiks, Brenda.
Contributor(s): Schippers, Baukje | Huijs, Moniek | Steen, Sofie.
Series: Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 11 (2) 2017: 65-73. 2017Disc region: text file PDF rda.Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resource Subject(s): INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY | RESTRICTIVE INTERVENTIONS | MANDATORY REPORTING | DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY SAFEGUARDS | LAW | THE NETHERLANDS | GREAT BRITAIN | INVOLUNTARY CARE | NEW DUTCH CARE AND COERCION ACT (WET ZORG EN DWANG) | DOLSOnline resources: Read this Article Summary: Advances a number of outlooks on the reporting of the use of coercive measures in the care for persons with intellectual disabilities. Discusses the following questions: which forms of involuntary care should be externally reported and how is this external reporting influenced by environmental and other factors? These issues are raised in the context of the New Dutch Care and Coercion Act concerning reporting the use of coercive measures.Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Article Research | IHC Library | Article (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available (Article available on request) | W008466 |
Advances a number of outlooks on the reporting of the use of coercive measures in the care for persons with intellectual disabilities. Discusses the following questions: which forms of involuntary care should be externally reported and how is this external reporting influenced by environmental and other factors? These issues are raised in the context of the New Dutch Care and Coercion Act concerning reporting the use of coercive measures.
There are no comments on this title.